WORLD TRADE CENTER COLLAPSES: EVIDENCE-BASED RESEARCH
This website contains:
- The most accurate visual reconstructions of the collapses of WTC1 and 2 that exist, identifying the collapse progression mechanisms of World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 (WTC1 and WTC2).
- The only accurate, detailed mapping of the earliest movements of each building available (anywhere). Detailed reconstruction of the moments leading up to and during the collapse initiations of each building is used to fact-check claims made by the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) in their official reports on the collapses and claims made by other organizations and individuals.
- Detailed critique of the official reports on WTC1, 2 and WTC7 by the NIST, showing that claims made within the reports on all 3 buildings directly contradict what can be verified through the visual record.
- Links to the largest and most complete collections of video and photographic evidence of the attacks, collapses and resulting debris available to the public.
- The most accurate reviews and critiques of academic and professional papers on the World Trade Center collapses that exist.
- Detailed descriptions of how professional/academic publications have misrepresented the collapse modes of the Twin Towers from 2001 to the present
- Identification of the 3 original sources of all professional/academic misrepresentations of the Twin Tower collapse modes
- Detailed critique of how Wikipedia has misrepresented the collapse modes of the Twin Towers from 2004 to the present
- Detailed critique of how journalists have misrepresented the collapse modes of the Twin Towers from 2001 to the present
- Open letters of protest to various news organizations about their misrepresentations of the Twin Towers collapse modes from 2001 the present
THE MOST (AND ONLY) ACCURATE WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING COLLAPSE MAPPINGS:
Twin Towers Collapse Progression Model (ROOSD)
World Trade Center 1 Complete Collapse Mappings
World Trade Center 2 Complete Collapse Mappings
World Trade Center 2 Aircraft Trajectory on Impact
World Trade Center 7 Complete Collapse Mappings
Twin Towers Collapse Progression Characteristics
How to Reconstruct and Review Collapse Events
How Subpixel Tracking is Used
Perimeter Wall Collapse Model
Twin Towers Collapse Progression Characteristics
Core of World Trade Center 1 Mapped During Collapse
Inward Bowing of Twin Towers Perimeter Walls Through Partial Core Failure
Lowest Bolted Connections above Mechnical Equipment Room (MER) Floors
Twin Towers Mechanical Equipment Room (MER) Layout
Progressive Floor Collapse FEA Simulations
Freefall Comparison
The Twin Tower Collapse Progression (ROOSD) Model as a Collapse Progressor or Collapse Initiator
PHYSICS IDEAS ON COLLAPSING 1 DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS:
Study of a Simple 1 Dimensional Collapsing System
Models of Inelastic Accretion
Attributes of a Rubble Driven Collapse
Mathematical Basis for Twin Tower (ROOSD) Collapse Propagation
COLLAPSE OF ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTIONAL STANDARDS AND ETHICS (WITH RESPECT TO THE WORLD TRADE CENTER COLLAPSES):
World Trade Center 1 NIST Collapse Misrepresentation
World Trade Center 2 NIST Collapse Misrepresentation
World Trade Center 7 NIST Collapse Misrepresentation
Original Sources of Academic-Professional Misrepresentations of the World Trade Center Collapses
Teamwork Between NIST and Dr Bazant to Misrepresent the World Trade Center Collapses
Entire Field of Academic Publications on the World Trade Center Collapses
Wikipedia Misrepresentations of the World Trade Center Collapses
Complete List of Wikipedia Misrepresentations of the World Trade Center Collapses from 2004 to the Present
Dr Bazant's World Trade Center Collapse Misrepresentations
Simple Methods to Spot Dr Bazant's World Trade Center Collapse Misrepresentations
'Block' Approaches to Misrepresenting the World Trade Center Collapses
Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth World Trade Center Collapse Misrepresentations
Purpose of the NIST Reports on the World Trade Center Collapses
Review of the Purpose of the NIST Reports on the World Trade Center Collapses
NIST Examined Only 2 Core Columns
Collected Graphic Misrepresentations of the Twin Towers Collapses
Critique of Dr Steven Jones Papers on the World Trade Center Collapses
Studies of Forgery of an Image Used by Steven Jones in his 2006 Paper
Critique of Dr Greening's 'WTC Energy Transfer Analysis'
The Problem with 'Microspheres'
Critique of 'Usmani'
Critique of Dr Seffen's 'Simple Collapse Analysis'
More World Trade Center Collapse Academic Papers
INFORMATION 'BLACK HOLE' AT THE CENTER OF EDUCATIONAL AND MEDIA INSTITUTIONS (WITH RESPECT TO THE WORLD TRADE CENTER COLLAPSES):
The Key to Misrepresenting the Twin Towers Collapse Progression Modes: Generalize and Mystify the Collapse Modes
Evidence of Not Knowing the Uniqueness and Distinctiveness of the Twin Towers Collapse Progression Modes
It Was Impossible To Understand What You Were Looking At Without Knowledge of the Unique Collapse Modes
How the Visual Record of Collapse Events was Filtered
22 Years of Twin Towers Collapse Misrepresentations Documented (2001 to the Present)
Patterns in How Collapse Misrepresentations Emerged and Propagated
The Failure of News Sources to Represent the Twin Towers Collapse Modes Accurately
A Representative Record of News Articles on the World Trade Center Collapses from 2001 to the Present
Alternative News Media's Failure to Approach the NIST Reports Critically
Bifurcated Zones of Knowledge of the World Trade Center Towers Collapse Modes
Systems of Information, Information Nets, and Information Black Holes
How Critical Thinking on the World Trade Center Towers Collapse Modes Broke Down
An Example of a Major Blunder Passing Under the Collective Mental Radar
Open letter to Consortium News Editors and Readers
Open letter to Counterpunch Magazine Editors and Readers
A Comparison Between Indochina Bombings and the Twin Towers Collapse Progressions
How Scientific Institutions Can Be Unaware of Contradiction
World Trade Center Demolition Question Reassessed
World Trade Center 1 Demolition Question Reassessed
World Trade Center 2 Demolition Question Reassessed
World Trade Center 7 Demolition Question Reassessed
Introduction to Book
Different Ways to State the Thesis
Conclusions
Science and Subjective Viewpoints
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER COLLAPSES REDUCED TO SIMPLE 'BITE-SIZED' MEMES AND FED TO A HUNGRY PUBLIC (AND TO THE ACADEMIC-PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY):
World Trade Center Collapse Memes in Mass Media
World Trade Center Collapse Memes in Popular Culture
World Trade Center Collapse Memes in Technical Literature
World Trace Center Collapse Records as Seen By John Q. Public
World Trade Center Collapse Records Studied as Meme Propagation
IMAGE LIBRARY: Direct access to image file system /911/images
VIDEO LIBRARY: Direct access to video file system /911/videos
Why preserve an independent, detailed visual record of the events at the World Trade Center complex on 9-11-01?
Without an accurate and detailed visual record of what really happened, there is no way to independently verify the truth of any claim made by official or non-official sources.
Re-examination of the complete visual record is the only way to distinguish between false claims and the true events. Without such re-examination, any false claims can be made by any party for any reason, and there is no way of knowing or verifying what actually happened independently from the sea of false claims that have been established since 2001.
For this reason the visual record was re-constructed and re-examined as completely as possible in this website. Visual records and mappings were preserved so that people affected by the events of 9/11/01 can fact-check what they have been told independently, free from the bias of governments or groups with their own personal motivations and interpretations.
The website is written in a way that discourages blind belief in any authoritative source (no matter how paternal). The website encourages sincere fact-checking by re-examination of direct visual evidence by people who have the skills and interest to do so. All observed features are presented in a way that gives any able reader the opportunity to verify information for themselves. All observations and measurements should be reproducible and testable by any capable person or organization. Links are provided to all source video from which measurements were taken so any capable reader can directly cross-check results.
Preservation and re-construction of the complete visual record is all the more essential because by doing so anyone can verify that the historical explanations of each collapse are verifiably untrue. The final reports on each collapse provided by U.S. Government agencies (the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)), contain (verifiably) gross errors. Errors can be confirmed by comparing claims made within each report with the extant visual record. Moreover, no government agency or academic body acknowledges (or seems to recognize) that gross errors exist in their records from 2005 to the present.
Gross errors are easily spotted once the visual record of events are re-assembled and re-viewed.
This website brings together the work of a number of independent researchers who actively shared their own discoveries and observations from around 2006 to 2013. Credit for research: Some former members of 'The 9/11 Forum' (forum now probably destroyed). Femr2, Achimspok, OneWhiteEye, Enik, Matt, other helpful contributors. Many ideas were taken from from comments made on 'The 9/11 Forum' and various forums where interesting research was shared.
Object tracking and sub-pixel measuring techniques were applied by 3 researchers independently of each other (for purposes of cross-checking results). Most every animated gif and video were created by others.
The author of this website was able to collect a record of movement of all 3 collapsed buildings that was verifiably superior to and grossly contradicted the record provided by U.S. Government agencies. I was able to correspond with other independent researchers who provided measurements and documented observables on a level far more intricate than that which previously existed. This website is a compilation of the collected data.
The author of this website can be contacted at: